Xeon W-3245M vs Gold 6138T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6138T
2017
20 cores / 40 threads, 125 Watt
13.35
Xeon W-3245M
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 205 Watt
17.34
+29.9%

W-3245M outperforms Gold 6138T by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6138T and Xeon W-3245M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking518334
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.509.91
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldIntel Xeon W
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,742$5,002
Current price$4999 (1.8x MSRP)$2000 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3245M has 561% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6138T.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6138T and Xeon W-3245M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4032
Base clock speed2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache1.25 MB1 MB
L2 cache20 MB16 MB
L3 cache27.5 MB22 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature94 °C77 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6138T and Xeon W-3245M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6138T and Xeon W-3245M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6138T and Xeon W-3245M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6138T and Xeon W-3245M are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6138T and Xeon W-3245M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size768 GB2 TB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6138T and Xeon W-3245M.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6138T 13.35
Xeon W-3245M 17.34
+29.9%

W-3245M outperforms Gold 6138T by 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Gold 6138T 20649
Xeon W-3245M 26814
+29.9%

W-3245M outperforms Gold 6138T by 30% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.35 17.34
Recency 25 April 2017 3 June 2019
Physical cores 20 16
Threads 40 32
Cost $2742 $5002
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 205 Watt

The Xeon W-3245M is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6138T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6138T and Xeon W-3245M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6138T
Xeon Gold 6138T
Intel Xeon W-3245M
Xeon W-3245M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6138T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon W-3245M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6138T or Xeon W-3245M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.