Pentium Dual T4500 vs Xeon Gold 6138

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6138
2017
20 cores / 40 threads, 125 Watt
15.80
+1716%
Pentium Dual Core T4500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.87

Xeon Gold 6138 outperforms Pentium Dual Core T4500 by a whopping 1716% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6138 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4472540
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.87no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldIntel Pentium Dual Core
Power efficiency11.502.26
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)1 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,612no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6138 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads402
Base clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s800 MHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache1.25 MB128 KB
L2 cache20 MB1 MB
L3 cache27.5 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6138 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647P
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6138 and Pentium Dual Core T4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6138 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6138 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6138 and Pentium Dual Core T4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6138 and Pentium Dual Core T4500.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6138 15.80
+1716%
Pentium Dual T4500 0.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6138 24121
+1705%
Pentium Dual T4500 1336

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.80 0.87
Recency 25 April 2017 1 January 2010
Physical cores 20 2
Threads 40 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon Gold 6138 has a 1716.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium Dual T4500, on the other hand, has 257.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6138 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium Dual Core T4500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6138 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium Dual Core T4500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6138 and Pentium Dual Core T4500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6138
Xeon Gold 6138
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
Pentium Dual Core T4500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 136 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6138 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 417 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6138 or Pentium Dual Core T4500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.