Athlon 64 X2 3800+ vs Xeon Gold 6136

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6136 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking519not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.69no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Manchester (2005−2006)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)August 2005 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,460no data
Current price$859 (0.3x MSRP)$87

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6136 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache768 KB256K
L2 cache12 MB512 KB
L3 cache24.75 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data220 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6136 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647939
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6136 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6136 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6136 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6136 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6136 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Gold 6136 20796
+3206%
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ 629

Xeon Gold 6136 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 3800+ by 3206% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon Gold 6136 1076
+430%
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ 203

Xeon Gold 6136 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 3800+ by 430% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon Gold 6136 9096
+2319%
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ 376

Xeon Gold 6136 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 3800+ by 2319% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 89 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon Gold 6136 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6136 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 64 X2 3800+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6136 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6136
Xeon Gold 6136
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+
Athlon 64 X2 3800+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 15 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6136 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 92 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6136 or Athlon 64 X2 3800+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.