EPYC 9654P vs Xeon Gold 6134

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6134
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 130 Watt
10.75
EPYC 9654P
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
73.67
+585%

EPYC 9654P outperforms Xeon Gold 6134 by a whopping 585% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 9654P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking6775
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation34.386.85
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Genoa
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,214$10,625
Current price$150 (0.1x MSRP)$5987 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6134 has 402% better value for money than EPYC 9654P.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 9654P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)96
Threads16192
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 9654P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647SP5
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 9654P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 9654P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 9654P are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 9654P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size768 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 9654P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6134 10.75
EPYC 9654P 73.67
+585%

EPYC 9654P outperforms Xeon Gold 6134 by 585% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Gold 6134 16621
EPYC 9654P 113949
+586%

EPYC 9654P outperforms Xeon Gold 6134 by 586% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.75 73.67
Recency 25 April 2017 10 November 2022
Physical cores 8 96
Threads 16 192
Cost $2214 $10625
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6134 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6134 and EPYC 9654P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6134
Xeon Gold 6134
AMD EPYC 9654P
EPYC 9654P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 8 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6134 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 9654P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6134 or EPYC 9654P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.