Xeon X5355 vs Gold 5222

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5222
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 105 Watt
6.09
+368%
Xeon X5355
2006
4 cores / 4 threads, 120 Watt
1.30

Xeon Gold 5222 outperforms Xeon X5355 by a whopping 368% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5222 and Xeon X5355 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10922276
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.140.04
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency5.391.01
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Clovertown (2006−2007)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)14 November 2006 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,221$1,172

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5222 has 12750% better value for money than Xeon X5355.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5222 and Xeon X5355 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz0.67 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier38no data
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB4 MB (per die)
L3 cache16.5 MB8 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data2x 143 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data63 °C
Number of transistorsno data582 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5222 and Xeon X5355 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647LGA771,PLGA771
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5222 and Xeon X5355. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data32 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FSB parityno data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5222 and Xeon X5355 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5222 and Xeon X5355 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5222 and Xeon X5355. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5222 and Xeon X5355.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5222 6.09
+368%
Xeon X5355 1.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5222 9489
+367%
Xeon X5355 2033

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.09 1.30
Recency 2 April 2019 14 November 2006
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 120 Watt

Xeon Gold 5222 has a 368.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 5222 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5355 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5222 and Xeon X5355, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5222
Xeon Gold 5222
Intel Xeon X5355
Xeon X5355

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5222 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon X5355 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5222 or Xeon X5355, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.