EPYC 7262 vs Xeon Gold 5217

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5217
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
9.98
EPYC 7262
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 155 Watt
13.43
+34.6%

EPYC 7262 outperforms Xeon Gold 5217 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5217 and EPYC 7262 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking757551
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.3710.56
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,522$575

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5217 has 93% better value for money than EPYC 7262.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5217 and EPYC 7262 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3032
L1 cache512 KB512 KB
L2 cache8 MB4 MB
L3 cache11 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5217 and EPYC 7262 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5217 and EPYC 7262. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5217 and EPYC 7262 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5217 and EPYC 7262 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5217 and EPYC 7262. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2667DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5217 and EPYC 7262.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5217 9.98
EPYC 7262 13.43
+34.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5217 15429
EPYC 7262 20779
+34.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.98 13.43
Recency 2 April 2019 7 August 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 155 Watt

Xeon Gold 5217 has 34.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7262, on the other hand, has a 34.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7262 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 5217 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5217 and EPYC 7262, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5217
Xeon Gold 5217
AMD EPYC 7262
EPYC 7262

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5217 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 21 vote

Rate EPYC 7262 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5217 or EPYC 7262, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.