Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ vs Xeon Gold 5120

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5120 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking681not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.20no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldMobile Athlon 64
Power efficiency10.27no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)August 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,555no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5120 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads281
Base clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache896 KB128K
L2 cache14 MB1 MB
L3 cache19.25 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nmno data
Die sizeno data193 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5120 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647754
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt62 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5120 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR1
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5120 18111
+5339%
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ 333

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 14 1
Threads 28 1
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 62 Watt

Xeon Gold 5120 has 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads.

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+, on the other hand, has 69.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Gold 5120 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 5120 is a server/workstation processor while Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5120 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5120
Xeon Gold 5120
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 6 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5120 or Mobile Athlon 64 3400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.