A9-9425 vs Xeon Gold 5120

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5120
2017
14 cores / 28 threads, 105 Watt
11.43
+546%

Xeon Gold 5120 outperforms A9-9425 by a whopping 546% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5120 and A9-9425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking6391930
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.44no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldAMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date11 July 2017 (6 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,555no data
Current price$379 (0.2x MSRP)$561

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5120 and A9-9425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads282
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache896 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache14 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5120 and A9-9425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FT4
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and A9-9425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512DDR4-2133 RAM (1 channel), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5120 and A9-9425 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and A9-9425 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and A9-9425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and A9-9425.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5120 11.43
+546%
A9-9425 1.77

Xeon Gold 5120 outperforms A9-9425 by 546% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Gold 5120 17686
+1070%
A9-9425 1511

Xeon Gold 5120 outperforms A9-9425 by 1070% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.43 1.77
Recency 11 July 2017 31 May 2016
Physical cores 14 2
Threads 28 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 15 Watt

The Xeon Gold 5120 is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9425 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 5120 is a server/workstation processor while A9-9425 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5120 and A9-9425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5120
Xeon Gold 5120
AMD A9-9425
A9-9425

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 6 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1509 votes

Rate A9-9425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5120 or A9-9425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.