Xeon D-2775TE vs E7320
Aggregate performance score
D-2775TE outperforms E7320 by a whopping 1758% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E7320 and Xeon D-2775TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2407 | 328 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Release date | 1 July 2007 (17 years ago) | 1 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Current price | $1614 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E7320 and Xeon D-2775TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 cache | 4 MB L2 Cache | 25 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 66 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | 1.0V-1.5V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E7320 and Xeon D-2775TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PGA604,PPGA604 | FCBGA2579 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 100 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7320 and Xeon D-2775TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | Launched |
Security technologies
Xeon E7320 and Xeon D-2775TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7320 and Xeon D-2775TE are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7320 and Xeon D-2775TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7320 and Xeon D-2775TE.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 32 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
D-2775TE outperforms E7320 by 1758% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
D-2775TE outperforms E7320 by 1758% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.95 | 17.65 |
| Recency | 1 July 2007 | 1 January 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 100 Watt |
The Xeon D-2775TE is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E7320 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7320 and Xeon D-2775TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
