Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) vs Xeon E5640

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5640
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
2.39
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
3.21
+34.3%

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) outperforms Xeon E5640 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5640 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking16991526
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.855.54
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Thuban (2010)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)1 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49no data
Current price$68 (1.4x MSRP)$50

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) has 552% better value for money than Xeon E5640.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5640 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads86
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size239 mm2346 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 million904 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5640 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366AM3
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5640 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5640 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5640 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5640 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5640 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W).

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5640 2.39
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) 3.21
+34.3%

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) outperforms Xeon E5640 by 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5640 3702
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) 4965
+34.1%

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) outperforms Xeon E5640 by 34% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.39 3.21
Recency 16 March 2010 1 May 2010
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 6
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 95 Watt

The Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5640 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5640 is a server/workstation processor while Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5640 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5640
Xeon E5640
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 34 votes

Rate Xeon E5640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1570 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5640 or Phenom II X6 1055T (95W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.