A12-9700P vs Xeon E5640

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5640
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
2.47
+55.3%

Xeon E5640 outperforms A12-9700P by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5640 and A12-9700P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17722120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.85no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency2.829.67
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5640 and A12-9700P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size239 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5640 and A12-9700P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FP4
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5640 and A12-9700P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
DualGraphics-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5640 and A12-9700P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5640 and A12-9700P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5640 and A12-9700P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5640 and A12-9700P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5640 and A12-9700P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5640 and A12-9700P.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5640 2.47
+55.3%
A12-9700P 1.59

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5640 3782
+55.8%
A12-9700P 2428

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.47 1.59
Recency 16 March 2010 1 June 2016
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon E5640 has a 55.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

A12-9700P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 433.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5640 is our recommended choice as it beats the A12-9700P in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5640 is a server/workstation processor while A12-9700P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5640 and A12-9700P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5640
Xeon E5640
AMD A12-9700P
A12-9700P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 34 votes

Rate Xeon E5640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 121 vote

Rate A12-9700P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5640 or A12-9700P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.