Athlon 64 2600+ vs Xeon E5620

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5620 and Athlon 64 2600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1811not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.08no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.68no data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Lima (2008−2009)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$35no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5620 and Athlon 64 2600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size239 mm277 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 million122 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5620 and Athlon 64 2600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366AM2
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5620 and Athlon 64 2600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5620 and Athlon 64 2600+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5620 and Athlon 64 2600+ are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5620 and Athlon 64 2600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5620 and Athlon 64 2600+.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5620 3592
+1378%
Athlon 64 2600+ 243

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon E5620 has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 2600+, on the other hand, has 433.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5620 and Athlon 64 2600+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5620 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 64 2600+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5620 and Athlon 64 2600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5620
Xeon E5620
AMD Athlon 64 2600+
Athlon 64 2600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 109 votes

Rate Xeon E5620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Athlon 64 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5620 or Athlon 64 2600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.