Ryzen 9 7945HX vs Xeon E5607

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5607
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
1.76
Ryzen 9 7945HX
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 55 Watt
35.83
+1936%

Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms Xeon E5607 by a whopping 1936% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5607 and Ryzen 9 7945HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2021105
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.66no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency2.0059.28
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$135no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5607 and Ryzen 9 7945HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed2.26 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed0.27 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm
Die size239 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5607 and Ryzen 9 7945HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FL1
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5607 and Ryzen 9 7945HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5607 and Ryzen 9 7945HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5607 and Ryzen 9 7945HX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5607 and Ryzen 9 7945HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5607 and Ryzen 9 7945HX.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data28

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5607 1.76
Ryzen 9 7945HX 35.83
+1936%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5607 2686
Ryzen 9 7945HX 54711
+1937%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.76 35.83
Recency 14 February 2011 4 January 2023
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 55 Watt

Ryzen 9 7945HX has a 1935.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and 45.5% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 7945HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5607 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5607 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7945HX is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5607 and Ryzen 9 7945HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5607
Xeon E5607
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
Ryzen 9 7945HX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 5 votes

Rate Xeon E5607 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 581 vote

Rate Ryzen 9 7945HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5607 or Ryzen 9 7945HX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.