Xeon E5335 vs E5520

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5520
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
1.60
+63.3%
Xeon E5335
2006
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
0.98

Xeon E5520 outperforms Xeon E5335 by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5520 and Xeon E5335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20942476
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.58no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.881.15
Architecture codenameGainestown (2009−2010)Clovertown (2006−2007)
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)14 November 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$19no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5520 and Xeon E5335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.26 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB (per die)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size263 mm22x 143 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data66 °C
Number of transistors731 million582 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5520 and Xeon E5335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA1366LGA771,PLGA771
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5520 and Xeon E5335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE40 Bitno data
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5520 and Xeon E5335 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5520 and Xeon E5335 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5520 and Xeon E5335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size144 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5520 and Xeon E5335.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5520 1.60
+63.3%
Xeon E5335 0.98

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5520 2529
+63.3%
Xeon E5335 1549

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.60 0.98
Recency 30 March 2009 14 November 2006
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

Xeon E5520 has a 63.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E5520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5335 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5520 and Xeon E5335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5520
Xeon E5520
Intel Xeon E5335
Xeon E5335

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 28 votes

Rate Xeon E5520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E5335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5520 or Xeon E5335, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.