Celeron G3930 vs Xeon E5520

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5520
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
1.59
+12%
Celeron G3930
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.42

Xeon E5520 outperforms Celeron G3930 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5520 and Celeron G3930 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20962195
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.580.69
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.882.63
Architecture codenameGainestown (2009−2010)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$19$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5520 has 274% better value for money than Celeron G3930.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5520 and Celeron G3930 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.26 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplierno data29
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size263 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature72 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5520 and Celeron G3930 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5520 and Celeron G3930. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5520 and Celeron G3930 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5520 and Celeron G3930 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5520 and Celeron G3930. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600
Maximum memory size144 GB64 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel HD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5520 and Celeron G3930 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5520 and Celeron G3930 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5520 and Celeron G3930 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5520 and Celeron G3930.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5520 1.59
+12%
Celeron G3930 1.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5520 2529
+12.4%
Celeron G3930 2249

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5520 348
Celeron G3930 605
+73.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5520 1448
+40.2%
Celeron G3930 1033

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.59 1.42
Recency 30 March 2009 3 January 2017
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 51 Watt

Xeon E5520 has a 12% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron G3930, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 56.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3930 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5520 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G3930 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5520 and Celeron G3930, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5520
Xeon E5520
Intel Celeron G3930
Celeron G3930

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 28 votes

Rate Xeon E5520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 238 votes

Rate Celeron G3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5520 or Celeron G3930, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.