Celeron M 575 vs Xeon E5507
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5507 outperforms Celeron M 575 by a whopping 384% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5507 and Celeron M 575 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2326 | 3150 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.11 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 1.43 | 0.76 |
| Architecture codename | Gainestown (2009−2010) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| Release date | 16 March 2010 (14 years ago) | 1 June 2008 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $457 | $86 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5507 and Celeron M 575 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.26 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 0.27 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 667 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 263 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 76 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 731 million | 291 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5507 and Celeron M 575 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | FCLGA1366 | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 31 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5507 and Celeron M 575. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 40 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E5507 and Celeron M 575 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5507 and Celeron M 575 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5507 and Celeron M 575. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 144 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 19.2 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5507 and Celeron M 575.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.21 | 0.25 |
| Recency | 16 March 2010 | 1 June 2008 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 31 Watt |
Xeon E5507 has a 384% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 575, on the other hand, has 158.1% lower power consumption.
The Xeon E5507 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 575 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E5507 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M 575 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5507 and Celeron M 575, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
