EPYC 9474F vs Xeon E5450

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5450
2007
80 Watt
1.63
EPYC 9474F
2022
48 cores / 96 threads, 360 Watt
66.11
+3956%

EPYC 9474F outperforms Xeon E5450 by a whopping 3956% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5450 and EPYC 9474F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking209511
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.58
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency1.9317.38
Architecture codenameno dataGenoa (2022−2023)
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,780

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5450 and EPYC 9474F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threadsno data96
Base clock speed3 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.1 GHz
Multiplierno data36
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data8x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5450 and EPYC 9474F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketLGA771SP5
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5450 and EPYC 9474F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5450 and EPYC 9474F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5450 and EPYC 9474F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5450 and EPYC 9474F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5450 and EPYC 9474F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5450 1.63
EPYC 9474F 66.11
+3956%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5450 2582
EPYC 9474F 105010
+3967%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.63 66.11
Recency 1 October 2007 10 November 2022
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 360 Watt

Xeon E5450 has 350% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9474F, on the other hand, has a 3955.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9474F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5450 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5450 and EPYC 9474F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5450
Xeon E5450
AMD EPYC 9474F
EPYC 9474F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1292 votes

Rate Xeon E5450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 19 votes

Rate EPYC 9474F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5450 or EPYC 9474F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.