Athlon Gold 3150U vs Celeron T3100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron T3100 and Athlon Gold 3150U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1740
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Power efficiencyno data15.85
Architecture codenameno dataDali (Zen) (2020)
Release date1 July 2008 (16 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron T3100 and Athlon Gold 3150U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Multiplierno data24
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron T3100 and Athlon Gold 3150U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA479,PGA478FP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T3100 and Athlon Gold 3150U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron T3100 and Athlon Gold 3150U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T3100 and Athlon Gold 3150U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron T3100 and Athlon Gold 3150U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron T3100 and Athlon Gold 3150U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron T3100 599
Athlon Gold 3150U 3988
+566%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron T3100 214
Athlon Gold 3150U 814
+280%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron T3100 365
Athlon Gold 3150U 1669
+357%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2008 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Athlon Gold 3150U has an age advantage of 11 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron T3100 and Athlon Gold 3150U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron T3100 and Athlon Gold 3150U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron T3100
Celeron T3100
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
Athlon Gold 3150U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 18 votes

Rate Celeron T3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 904 votes

Rate Athlon Gold 3150U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron T3100 or Athlon Gold 3150U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.