Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs Xeon E5440

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5440
2008
80 Watt
1.53
+10.9%

Xeon E5440 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20162115
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.382.69
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)1 July 2009 (14 years ago)
Current price$90 $42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 has 608% better value for money than Xeon E5440.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Base clock speed2.83 GHz2.83 GHz
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature67 °C71 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35V0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketLGA771FCLGA775,LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Quad Q9505. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching+-
FSB parity+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Quad Q9505 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5440 1.53
+10.9%
Core 2 Quad Q9505 1.38

Xeon E5440 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5440 2374
+10.9%
Core 2 Quad Q9505 2141

Xeon E5440 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by 11% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5440 361
+1.1%
Core 2 Quad Q9505 357

Xeon E5440 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by 1% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5440 1052
+1.6%
Core 2 Quad Q9505 1035

Xeon E5440 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9505 by 2% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.53 1.38
Recency 1 January 2008 1 July 2009
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 95 Watt

The Xeon E5440 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q9505 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5440 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Quad Q9505 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5440 and Core 2 Quad Q9505, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5440
Xeon E5440
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9505
Core 2 Quad Q9505

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 439 votes

Rate Xeon E5440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 41 vote

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5440 or Core 2 Quad Q9505, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.