Xeon L5518 vs E5420

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5420 and Xeon L5518 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2252not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameno dataGainestown (2009−2010)
Release date1 October 2007 (16 years ago)30 March 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5420 and Xeon L5518 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data4 (Quad-Core)
Threadsno data8
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.133 GHz
Boost clock speedno data2.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data256 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data263 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data731 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5420 and Xeon L5518 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketLGA7711366
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt60 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5420 and Xeon L5518. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5420 and Xeon L5518 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5420 and Xeon L5518 are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5420 and Xeon L5518. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5420 and Xeon L5518.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2007 30 March 2009
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 60 Watt

Xeon L5518 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5420 and Xeon L5518. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5420 and Xeon L5518, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5420
Xeon E5420
Intel Xeon L5518
Xeon L5518

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 155 votes

Rate Xeon E5420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Xeon L5518 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5420 or Xeon L5518, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.