FX-4300 vs Xeon E5-4669 v4

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E5-4669 v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads
7.45
+284%

Xeon E5-4669 v4 outperforms FX-4300 by a whopping 284% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4669 v4 and FX-4300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking8871851
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.453.58
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date20 June 2016 (7 years ago)23 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,007no data
Current price$3531 (0.5x MSRP)$66

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-4300 has 696% better value for money than Xeon E5-4669 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4669 v4 and FX-4300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads444
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4 GHz
Bus support2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
L2 cache5.5 MB4096 KB
L3 cache55 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size456.12 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C71 °C
Number of transistors7200 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.225 V - Max: 1.3875 V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4669 v4 and FX-4300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketFCLGA2011AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4669 v4 and FX-4300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Instruction Replay-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4669 v4 and FX-4300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4669 v4 and FX-4300 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4669 v4 and FX-4300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4669 v4 and FX-4300.

PCIe version3.0n/a
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4669 v4 7.45
+284%
FX-4300 1.94

Xeon E5-4669 v4 outperforms FX-4300 by 284% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-4669 v4 11523
+285%
FX-4300 2993

Xeon E5-4669 v4 outperforms FX-4300 by 285% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.45 1.94
Recency 20 June 2016 23 October 2012
Physical cores 22 4
Threads 44 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 95 Watt

The Xeon E5-4669 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4669 v4 is a server/workstation processor while FX-4300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4669 v4 and FX-4300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4669 v4
Xeon E5-4669 v4
AMD FX-4300
FX-4300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 9 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4669 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1611 votes

Rate FX-4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4669 v4 or FX-4300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.