EPYC 4464P vs Xeon E5-4669 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4669 v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads, 135 Watt
7.25
EPYC 4464P
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
30.54
+321%

EPYC 4464P outperforms Xeon E5-4669 v4 by a whopping 321% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4669 v4 and EPYC 4464P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking982134
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.3066.29
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency5.0827.53
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,007$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4464P has 21997% better value for money than Xeon E5-4669 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4669 v4 and EPYC 4464P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads4424
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache5.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache55 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size456.12 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors7200 Million13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4669 v4 and EPYC 4464P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011AM5
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4669 v4 and EPYC 4464P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4669 v4 and EPYC 4464P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4669 v4 and EPYC 4464P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4669 v4 and EPYC 4464P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4669 v4 and EPYC 4464P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4028

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4669 v4 7.25
EPYC 4464P 30.54
+321%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4669 v4 11523
EPYC 4464P 48518
+321%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.25 30.54
Recency 20 June 2016 21 May 2024
Physical cores 22 12
Threads 44 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 105 Watt

Xeon E5-4669 v4 has 83.3% more physical cores and 83.3% more threads.

EPYC 4464P, on the other hand, has a 321.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 4464P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-4669 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4669 v4 and EPYC 4464P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4669 v4
Xeon E5-4669 v4
AMD EPYC 4464P
EPYC 4464P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 11 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4669 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 4464P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4669 v4 or EPYC 4464P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.