Ryzen Embedded 8640U vs Xeon E5-4667 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4667 v4 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking595not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.20no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency8.97no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Hawk Point (2024)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)2 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,729no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4667 v4 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads3612
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache45 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size456.12 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature87 °Cno data
Number of transistors7200 Million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4667 v4 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FP8
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4667 v4 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4667 v4 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4667 v4 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4667 v4 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 760M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4667 v4 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 2 April 2024
Physical cores 18 6
Threads 36 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 28 Watt

Xeon E5-4667 v4 has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Ryzen Embedded 8640U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 382.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-4667 v4 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4667 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Embedded 8640U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4667 v4 and Ryzen Embedded 8640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4667 v4
Xeon E5-4667 v4
AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U
Ryzen Embedded 8640U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 59 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4667 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Embedded 8640U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4667 v4 or Ryzen Embedded 8640U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.