Ryzen 5 7520U vs Xeon E5-4650 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4650 v2
2014
10 cores / 20 threads, 95 Watt
7.15
+18.8%

Xeon E5-4650 v2 outperforms Ryzen 5 7520U by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4650 v2 and Ryzen 5 7520U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking9281032
Place by popularitynot in top-1009
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.41no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Architecture codenameno dataMendocino-U (Zen 2)
Release date1 January 2014 (10 years ago)20 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Current price$250 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4650 v2 and Ryzen 5 7520U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads208
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cache25 MB Intel® Smart Cache4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data100 mm2
Maximum core temperature75 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4650 v2 and Ryzen 5 7520U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketFCLGA2011FP6
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4650 v2 and Ryzen 5 7520U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXLPDDR5-5500 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4650 v2 and Ryzen 5 7520U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4650 v2 and Ryzen 5 7520U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4650 v2 and Ryzen 5 7520U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866DDR5
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4650 v2 and Ryzen 5 7520U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes404

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4650 v2 7.15
+18.8%
Ryzen 5 7520U 6.02

Xeon E5-4650 v2 outperforms Ryzen 5 7520U by 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-4650 v2 11064
+18.9%
Ryzen 5 7520U 9306

Xeon E5-4650 v2 outperforms Ryzen 5 7520U by 19% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.15 6.02
Recency 1 January 2014 20 September 2022
Physical cores 10 4
Threads 20 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

The Xeon E5-4650 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 7520U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4650 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 7520U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4650 v2 and Ryzen 5 7520U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4650 v2
Xeon E5-4650 v2
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
Ryzen 5 7520U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 49 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4650 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1128 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7520U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4650 v2 or Ryzen 5 7520U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.