Celeron M 430 vs Xeon E5-4617

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4617 and Celeron M 430 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1342not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.16no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$90no data
Current price$2508 (27.9x MSRP)$222

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4617 and Celeron M 430 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads61
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.73 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus supportno data533 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data1.0V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4617 and Celeron M 430 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4no data
SocketFCLGA2011PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4617 and Celeron M 430. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4617 and Celeron M 430 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Identity Protection-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4617 and Celeron M 430 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4617 and Celeron M 430. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4617 and Celeron M 430.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-4617 6298
+3627%
Celeron M 430 169

Xeon E5-4617 outperforms Celeron M 430 by 3627% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 1
Threads 6 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 27 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-4617 and Celeron M 430. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4617 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M 430 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4617 and Celeron M 430, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4617
Xeon E5-4617
Intel Celeron M 430
Celeron M 430

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 7 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4617 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 21 vote

Rate Celeron M 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4617 or Celeron M 430, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.