Ryzen 9 3950X vs Xeon E5-4610

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4610
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
4.18
Ryzen 9 3950X
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 105 Watt
25.07
+500%

Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Xeon E5-4610 by a whopping 500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4610 and Ryzen 9 3950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1317177
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.3614.91
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 9
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)14 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799
Current price$18 $1272 (1.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 3950X has 4042% better value for money than Xeon E5-4610.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4610 and Ryzen 9 3950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1232
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache15 MB (shared)64 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size435 mm22 x 72 mm + 125 mm (IO-Die) mm2
Number of transistors2,270 million19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4610 and Ryzen 9 3950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4610 and Ryzen 9 3950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4610 and Ryzen 9 3950X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4610 and Ryzen 9 3950X are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4610 and Ryzen 9 3950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size384 GB128 GB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4610 and Ryzen 9 3950X.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4610 4.18
Ryzen 9 3950X 25.07
+500%

Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Xeon E5-4610 by 500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-4610 6460
Ryzen 9 3950X 38780
+500%

Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Xeon E5-4610 by 500% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.18 25.07
Recency 14 May 2012 14 November 2019
Physical cores 6 16
Threads 12 32
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 105 Watt

The Ryzen 9 3950X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-4610 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4610 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 3950X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4610 and Ryzen 9 3950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4610
Xeon E5-4610
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Ryzen 9 3950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 697 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4610 or Ryzen 9 3950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.