Ryzen 3 5400U vs Xeon E5-4610

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4610
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
4.22
Ryzen 3 5400U
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
7.22
+71.1%

Ryzen 3 5400U outperforms Xeon E5-4610 by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4610 and Ryzen 3 5400U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13951000
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency2.9643.89
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Cezanne-U (Zen 3) (2021)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4610 and Ryzen 3 5400U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data26
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache15 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size435 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors2,270 million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4610 and Ryzen 3 5400U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketFCLGA2011FP6
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4610 and Ryzen 3 5400U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4610 and Ryzen 3 5400U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4610 and Ryzen 3 5400U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4610 and Ryzen 3 5400U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4610 and Ryzen 3 5400U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes408

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4610 4.22
Ryzen 3 5400U 7.22
+71.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4610 6460
Ryzen 3 5400U 11047
+71%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.22 7.22
Recency 14 May 2012 12 January 2021
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon E5-4610 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen 3 5400U, on the other hand, has a 71.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 5400U is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-4610 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4610 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 5400U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4610 and Ryzen 3 5400U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4610
Xeon E5-4610
AMD Ryzen 3 5400U
Ryzen 3 5400U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 119 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 5400U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4610 or Ryzen 3 5400U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.