Ryzen 3 3250U vs Xeon E5-2699 v4

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E5-2699 v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads
16.50
+563%

Xeon E5-2699 v4 outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U by a whopping 563% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Ryzen 3 3250U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking3571648
Place by popularitynot in top-10066
Cost-effectiveness evaluation37.48no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD Ryzen 3
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Picasso (2019−2020)
Release date20 June 2016 (7 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,115no data
Current price$205 (0x MSRP)$430

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Ryzen 3 3250U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads444
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus support2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cache5.5 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache55 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size456.12 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °C95 °C
Number of transistors7200 Million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Ryzen 3 3250U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FP5
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Ryzen 3 3250U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2DDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Ryzen 3 3250U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Ryzen 3 3250U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Ryzen 3 3250U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4
Maximum memory size1.5 TB32 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Ryzen 3 3250U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2699 v4 16.50
+563%
Ryzen 3 3250U 2.49

Xeon E5-2699 v4 outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U by 563% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2699 v4 25518
+562%
Ryzen 3 3250U 3854

Xeon E5-2699 v4 outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U by 562% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2699 v4 1022
+36.1%
Ryzen 3 3250U 751

Xeon E5-2699 v4 outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U by 36% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2699 v4 8231
+468%
Ryzen 3 3250U 1449

Xeon E5-2699 v4 outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U by 468% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.50 2.49
Recency 20 June 2016 6 January 2020
Physical cores 22 2
Threads 44 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 15 Watt

The Xeon E5-2699 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3250U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2699 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 3250U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2699 v4 and Ryzen 3 3250U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4
Xeon E5-2699 v4
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 429 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1948 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2699 v4 or Ryzen 3 3250U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.