Xeon E5-2630L vs E5-2697 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2697 v4
2016
18 cores / 36 threads, 145 Watt
13.63
+297%

E5-2697 v4 outperforms E5-2630L by a whopping 297% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Xeon E5-2630L processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking5311526
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.83no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2014−2019)Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)6 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,702no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Xeon E5-2630L basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads3612
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier23no data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4.5 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache45 MB15360 KB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size456.12 mm2435 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °C70 °C
Number of transistors7200 Million2,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Xeon E5-2630L compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
Socketno data2011
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt60 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Xeon E5-2630L. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Xeon E5-2630L technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Xeon E5-2630L. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory size1,536 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s42.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Xeon E5-2630L.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4040

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2697 v4 13.63
+297%
Xeon E5-2630L 3.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2697 v4 21081
+297%
Xeon E5-2630L 5305

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2697 v4 1046
+122%
Xeon E5-2630L 472

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2697 v4 8128
+177%
Xeon E5-2630L 2935

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.63 3.43
Recency 20 June 2016 6 March 2012
Physical cores 18 6
Threads 36 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 60 Watt

Xeon E5-2697 v4 has a 297.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2630L, on the other hand, has 141.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2697 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2630L in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v4 and Xeon E5-2630L, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4
Xeon E5-2697 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2630L
Xeon E5-2630L

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 194 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2697 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 15 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2630L on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697 v4 or Xeon E5-2630L, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.