Xeon Platinum 8352Y vs E5-2697 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2697 v3
2014
14 cores / 28 threads, 145 Watt
12.09
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
44.38
+267%

Platinum 8352Y outperforms E5-2697 v3 by a whopping 267% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking59840
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation34.1244.38
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014)no data
Release date8 September 2014 (9 years ago)1 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$67 $2000

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y has 30% better value for money than Xeon E5-2697 v3.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads2864
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache35 MB (shared)48 MB
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature77 °C81 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors5,560 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size768 GB6 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4064

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2697 v3 12.09
Xeon Platinum 8352Y 44.38
+267%

Platinum 8352Y outperforms E5-2697 v3 by 267% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2697 v3 18696
Xeon Platinum 8352Y 68643
+267%

Platinum 8352Y outperforms E5-2697 v3 by 267% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.09 44.38
Recency 8 September 2014 1 April 2021
Physical cores 14 32
Threads 28 64
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 205 Watt

The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2697 v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
Xeon E5-2697 v3
Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Xeon Platinum 8352Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 567 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2697 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8352Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697 v3 or Xeon Platinum 8352Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.