Ryzen 3 7320C vs Xeon E5-2697 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2697 v2
2013
12 cores / 24 threads, 130 Watt
9.33
+65.7%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Ryzen 3 7320C by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Ryzen 3 7320C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8441151
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.96no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency6.5434.22
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Ryzen 3 7320C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate8GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache30 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography22 nm6 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Ryzen 3 7320C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011no data
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Ryzen 3 7320C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Ryzen 3 7320C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Ryzen 3 7320C are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Ryzen 3 7320C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Ryzen 3 7320C.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2697 v2 9.33
+65.7%
Ryzen 3 7320C 5.63

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2697 v2 14274
+65.7%
Ryzen 3 7320C 8614

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.33 5.63
Recency 1 September 2013 20 September 2022
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon E5-2697 v2 has a 65.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Ryzen 3 7320C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 266.7% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 7320C in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2697 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 7320C is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Ryzen 3 7320C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Xeon E5-2697 v2
AMD Ryzen 3 7320C
Ryzen 3 7320C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 750 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2697 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 7320C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697 v2 or Ryzen 3 7320C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.