Pentium N3530 vs Xeon E5-2697 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2697 v2
2013
12 cores / 24 threads, 130 Watt
9.25
+1101%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Pentium N3530 by a whopping 1101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Pentium N3530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking7782545
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.85no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)Intel Pentium
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date1 September 2013 (10 years ago)23 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723no data
Current price$96 (0.1x MSRP)$223

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Pentium N3530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.58 GHz
Bus support8GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)224 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache30 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature86 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Pentium N3530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Pentium N3530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX-no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Smart Connectno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Pentium N3530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection--
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Pentium N3530 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Pentium N3530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L-1333
Maximum memory size768 GB8 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data896 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Pentium N3530 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Pentium N3530.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes404
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2697 v2 9.25
+1101%
Pentium N3530 0.77

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 1101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 14311
+1105%
Pentium N3530 1188

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 1105% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 554
+195%
Pentium N3530 188

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 195% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 4294
+684%
Pentium N3530 548

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 684% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 4173
+218%
Pentium N3530 1313

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 218% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 34776
+681%
Pentium N3530 4450

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 681% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 12.31
+91.7%
Pentium N3530 23.6

Pentium N3530 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by 92% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 18
+867%
Pentium N3530 2

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 867% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 1550
+1088%
Pentium N3530 131

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 1088% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 105
+169%
Pentium N3530 39

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 169% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 1.25
+166%
Pentium N3530 0.47

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 166% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 8.7
+3007%
Pentium N3530 0.3

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 3007% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 7269
+483%
Pentium N3530 1246

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 483% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 85
+685%
Pentium N3530 11

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 685% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 165
+206%
Pentium N3530 54

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Pentium N3530 by 206% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.25 0.77
Recency 1 September 2013 23 February 2014
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 4
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 7 Watt

The Xeon E5-2697 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium N3530 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2697 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium N3530 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Pentium N3530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Xeon E5-2697 v2
Intel Pentium N3530
Pentium N3530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 701 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2697 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 165 votes

Rate Pentium N3530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697 v2 or Pentium N3530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.