EPYC 7453 vs Xeon E5-2697 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2697 v2
2013
12 cores / 24 threads, 130 Watt
9.25
EPYC 7453
2021
28 cores / 56 threads, 225 Watt
32.70
+254%

EPYC 7453 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by a whopping 254% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v2 and EPYC 7453 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking779109
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.8521.35
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Milan (2021)
Release date1 September 2013 (10 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723$1,570
Current price$96 (0.1x MSRP)$1525 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2697 v2 has 2% better value for money than EPYC 7453.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v2 and EPYC 7453 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads2456
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.75 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.45 GHz
Bus support8GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm+
Die size160 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v2 and EPYC 7453 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA2011SP3
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and EPYC 7453. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v2 and EPYC 7453 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and EPYC 7453 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and EPYC 7453. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size768 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and EPYC 7453.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes40128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2697 v2 9.25
EPYC 7453 32.70
+254%

EPYC 7453 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by 254% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 14307
EPYC 7453 50575
+253%

EPYC 7453 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by 253% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.25 32.70
Recency 1 September 2013 15 March 2021
Physical cores 12 28
Threads 24 56
Cost $1723 $1570
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 225 Watt

The EPYC 7453 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2697 v2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v2 and EPYC 7453, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Xeon E5-2697 v2
AMD EPYC 7453
EPYC 7453

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 695 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2697 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7453 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697 v2 or EPYC 7453, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.