EPYC 9534 vs Xeon E5-2696 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2696 v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads, 150 Watt
16.04
EPYC 9534
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
57.36
+258%

EPYC 9534 outperforms Xeon E5-2696 v4 by a whopping 258% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2696 v4 and EPYC 9534 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking39419
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.666.93
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Genoa
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,803
Current price$1265 $4700 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9534 has 22% better value for money than Xeon E5-2696 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2696 v4 and EPYC 9534 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads44128
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.45 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus support2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache5.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache55 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size456.12 mm28x 72 mm2
Number of transistors7200 Million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2696 v4 and EPYC 9534 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and EPYC 9534. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2696 v4 and EPYC 9534 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and EPYC 9534 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and EPYC 9534. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size1,536 GB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and EPYC 9534.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes40128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2696 v4 16.04
EPYC 9534 57.36
+258%

EPYC 9534 outperforms Xeon E5-2696 v4 by 258% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2696 v4 24813
EPYC 9534 88716
+258%

EPYC 9534 outperforms Xeon E5-2696 v4 by 258% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.04 57.36
Recency 20 June 2016 10 November 2022
Physical cores 22 64
Threads 44 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 280 Watt

The EPYC 9534 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2696 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2696 v4 and EPYC 9534, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2696 v4
Xeon E5-2696 v4
AMD EPYC 9534
EPYC 9534

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 337 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2696 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9534 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2696 v4 or EPYC 9534, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.