EPYC 7473X vs Xeon E5-2696 V3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2696 V3
2014
18 cores / 36 threads, 145 Watt
13.95
EPYC 7473X
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
37.46
+169%

EPYC 7473X outperforms Xeon E5-2696 V3 by a whopping 169% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2696 V3 and EPYC 7473X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking52885
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency9.0714.71
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Milan-X (2022)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2696 V3 and EPYC 7473X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads3648
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache45 MB (shared)768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm
Die size356 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million33,200 million
64 bit support+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2696 V3 and EPYC 7473X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
Socket2011-3SP3
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and EPYC 7473X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2696 V3 and EPYC 7473X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and EPYC 7473X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and EPYC 7473X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channelDDR4-3200

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and EPYC 7473X.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes40128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 13.95
EPYC 7473X 37.46
+169%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 22073
EPYC 7473X 59280
+169%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.95 37.46
Recency 8 September 2014 22 March 2022
Physical cores 18 24
Threads 36 48
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 240 Watt

Xeon E5-2696 V3 has 65.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7473X, on the other hand, has a 168.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7473X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2696 V3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2696 V3 and EPYC 7473X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2696 V3
Xeon E5-2696 V3
AMD EPYC 7473X
EPYC 7473X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 1201 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2696 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 7473X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2696 V3 or EPYC 7473X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.