Xeon Platinum 8454H vs E5-2695 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2695 v2
2013
12 cores / 24 threads, 115 Watt
8.71
Xeon Platinum 8454H
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 270 Watt
40.83
+369%

Xeon Platinum 8454H outperforms Xeon E5-2695 v2 by a whopping 369% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8454H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking88868
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.5010.29
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency6.8913.76
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,950$6,540

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8454H has 586% better value for money than Xeon E5-2695 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8454H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads2464
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)82.5 MB
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size160 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8454H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration28
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8454H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8454H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8454H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8454H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size768 GB4 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8454H.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2695 v2 8.71
Xeon Platinum 8454H 40.83
+369%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2695 v2 13306
Xeon Platinum 8454H 62347
+369%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.71 40.83
Recency 1 September 2013 10 January 2023
Physical cores 12 32
Threads 24 64
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 270 Watt

Xeon E5-2695 v2 has 134.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8454H, on the other hand, has a 368.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

The Xeon Platinum 8454H is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2695 v2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Xeon Platinum 8454H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
Xeon E5-2695 v2
Intel Xeon Platinum 8454H
Xeon Platinum 8454H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 70 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2695 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8454H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2695 v2 or Xeon Platinum 8454H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.