i9-10880H vs Xeon E5-2695 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2695 v2
2013
12 cores / 24 threads, 115 Watt
8.60
Core i9-10880H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
9.47
+10.1%

i9-10880H outperforms Xeon E5-2695 v2 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Core i9-10880H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking872802
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.73no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Comet Lake
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Comet Lake-H (2020)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,950no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Core i9-10880H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache30 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature81 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Core i9-10880H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Core i9-10880H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Core i9-10880H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Core i9-10880H are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Core i9-10880H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 630

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Core i9-10880H.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2695 v2 8.60
i9-10880H 9.47
+10.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2695 v2 13306
i9-10880H 14642
+10%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.60 9.47
Recency 1 September 2013 2 April 2020
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 45 Watt

Xeon E5-2695 v2 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

i9-10880H, on the other hand, has a 10.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 155.6% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-10880H is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2695 v2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2695 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-10880H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2695 v2 and Core i9-10880H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
Xeon E5-2695 v2
Intel Core i9-10880H
Core i9-10880H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 65 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2695 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 61 vote

Rate Core i9-10880H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2695 v2 or Core i9-10880H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.