A6-9220C vs Xeon E5-2695 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2695 v2
2013
12 cores / 24 threads, 115 Watt
8.53
+1154%
A6-9220C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.68

Xeon E5-2695 v2 outperforms A6-9220C by a whopping 1154% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2695 v2 and A6-9220C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8982737
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.48no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency6.8910.53
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,950no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2695 v2 and A6-9220C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data18
L1 cache64 KB (per core)160 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size160 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2695 v2 and A6-9220C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FT4
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2695 v2 and A6-9220C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXVirtualization,
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2695 v2 and A6-9220C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2695 v2 and A6-9220C are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2695 v2 and A6-9220C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/s14.936 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2695 v2 and A6-9220C.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes408

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2695 v2 8.53
+1154%
A6-9220C 0.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2695 v2 13299
+1163%
A6-9220C 1053

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.53 0.68
Recency 1 September 2013 6 January 2019
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon E5-2695 v2 has a 1154.4% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

A6-9220C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and 1816.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2695 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9220C in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2695 v2 is a server/workstation processor while A6-9220C is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2695 v2 and A6-9220C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
Xeon E5-2695 v2
AMD A6-9220C
A6-9220C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 95 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2695 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 32 votes

Rate A6-9220C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2695 v2 or A6-9220C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.