i7-3770T vs Xeon E5-2692 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2692 v2
2013
12 cores / 24 threads, 100 Watt
7.92
+122%

Xeon E5-2692 v2 outperforms Core i7-3770T by a whopping 122% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Core i7-3770T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9551544
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.39
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency7.227.21
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)29 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$330

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Core i7-3770T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size160 mm2160 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Core i7-3770T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket2011FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Core i7-3770T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Core i7-3770T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Core i7-3770T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Core i7-3770T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 4000
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.15 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Core i7-3770T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Core i7-3770T.

PCIe version3.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2692 v2 7.92
+122%
i7-3770T 3.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2692 v2 12119
+123%
i7-3770T 5444

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.92 3.56
Recency 1 September 2013 29 April 2012
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 8
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 45 Watt

Xeon E5-2692 v2 has a 122.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

i7-3770T, on the other hand, has 122.2% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2692 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-3770T in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2692 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-3770T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2692 v2 and Core i7-3770T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2692 v2
Xeon E5-2692 v2
Intel Core i7-3770T
Core i7-3770T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 7 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2692 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 63 votes

Rate Core i7-3770T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2692 v2 or Core i7-3770T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.