Celeron M U3600 vs Xeon E5-2690 v4

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Celeron M U3600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking623not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.98no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Celeron M
Power efficiency8.59no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)18 December 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,090no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Celeron M U3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads282
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s2500 MHz
Multiplier26no data
L2 cache3.5 MB512 KB
L3 cache35 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size306.18 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature89 °Cno data
Number of transistors4700 Million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Celeron M U3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA2011BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Celeron M U3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Celeron M U3600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Celeron M U3600 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Celeron M U3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Celeron M U3600.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 18 December 2010
Physical cores 14 2
Threads 28 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 18 Watt

Xeon E5-2690 v4 has an age advantage of 5 years, 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M U3600, on the other hand, has 650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Celeron M U3600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2690 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M U3600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Celeron M U3600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
Xeon E5-2690 v4
Intel Celeron M U3600
Celeron M U3600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 1657 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2690 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M U3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2690 v4 or Celeron M U3600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.