Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 vs Xeon E5-2689
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 outperforms Xeon E5-2689 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2689 and Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1043 | 967 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | Xeon | AMD Ryzen 5 |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) | Zen (2017−2020) |
Release date | 6 March 2012 (12 years ago) | 29 June 2017 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2689 and Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 16 | 12 |
Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 32 |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 576 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 3 MB |
L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 435 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 2,270 million | 4800 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2689 and Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | 2011 | AM4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Ryzen 5 PRO 1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2689 and Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Ryzen 5 PRO 1600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 42.671 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | N/A | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Ryzen 5 PRO 1600.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 40 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 6.41 | 7.27 |
Recency | 6 March 2012 | 29 June 2017 |
Physical cores | 8 | 6 |
Threads | 16 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 65 Watt |
Xeon E5-2689 has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.
Ryzen 5 PRO 1600, on the other hand, has a 13.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 76.9% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2689 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2689 and Ryzen 5 PRO 1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.