Celeron J3355 vs Xeon E5-2689 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2689 v4
2016
10 cores / 20 threads, 165 Watt
10.73
+1331%
Celeron J3355
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.75

Xeon E5-2689 v4 outperforms Celeron J3355 by a whopping 1331% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Celeron J3355 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7282663
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.780.06
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency6.157.09
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)30 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,723$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2689 v4 has 2867% better value for money than Celeron J3355.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Celeron J3355 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads202
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier3120
L2 cache2.5 MB1 MB
L3 cache25 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature52 °C105 °C
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Celeron J3355 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011-3FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Celeron J3355. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Celeron J3355 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-+
OS Guard+-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Celeron J3355 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Celeron J3355. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size1.5 TB8 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data700 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Celeron J3355 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Celeron J3355 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Celeron J3355.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes406
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2689 v4 10.73
+1331%
Celeron J3355 0.75

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2689 v4 17049
+1324%
Celeron J3355 1197

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2689 v4 1139
+317%
Celeron J3355 273

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2689 v4 7019
+1426%
Celeron J3355 460

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.73 0.75
Recency 20 June 2016 30 August 2016
Physical cores 10 2
Threads 20 2
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon E5-2689 v4 has a 1330.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads.

Celeron J3355, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 1550% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2689 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3355 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2689 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J3355 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2689 v4 and Celeron J3355, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2689 v4
Xeon E5-2689 v4
Intel Celeron J3355
Celeron J3355

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 189 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2689 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 58 votes

Rate Celeron J3355 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2689 v4 or Celeron J3355, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.