Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Xeon E5-2695 v4

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	618	711
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.02	4.28
Market segment	Server	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Xeon E5	AMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codename	Broadwell (2014−2019)	Zen (2017−2020)
Release date	20 June 2016 (8 years ago)	30 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,424	$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has 42% better value for money than Xeon E5-2695 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	18 (Octadeca-Core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	36	16
Base clock speed	2.1 GHz	3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.3 GHz	3.8 GHz
Bus type	QPI	no data
Bus rate	2 × 9.6 GT/s	4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier	21	38
L1 cache	no data	768 KB
L2 cache	4.5 MB	4 MB
L3 cache	45 MB	16 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	14 nm
Die size	456.12 mm2	213 mm2
Maximum core temperature	84 °C	no data
Number of transistors	7200 Million	9600 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2 (Multiprocessor)	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	FCLGA2011	SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX2	no data
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
TSX	+	-
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	no data
PAE	46 Bit	no data
Status	Launched	no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
OS Guard	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400	DDR4 Quad-channel
Maximum memory size	1.5 TB	2 TiB
Max memory channels	4	4
Maximum memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	85.33 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.

PCIe version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	40	60

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	12.39	10.90
Recency	20 June 2016	30 July 2017
Physical cores	18	8
Threads	36	16
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	180 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---