Xeon D-1587 vs E5-2687W

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2687W
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 150 Watt
6.53
Xeon D-1587
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
8.86
+35.7%

Xeon D-1587 outperforms Xeon E5-2687W by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2687W and Xeon D-1587 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1058880
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.982.11
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon D
Power efficiency3.9712.43
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)24 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$815$1,443

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon D-1587 has 7% better value for money than Xeon E5-2687W.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2687W and Xeon D-1587 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed3.1 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data17
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size435 mm2306.18 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors2,270 million4700 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2687W and Xeon D-1587 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA1667
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2687W and Xeon D-1587. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
GPIOno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2687W and Xeon D-1587 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2687W and Xeon D-1587 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2687W and Xeon D-1587. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR3
Maximum memory size256 GB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s34.124 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2687W and Xeon D-1587.

PCIe version3.02.0/3.0
PCI Express lanes4024
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data6
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data+
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2687W 6.53
Xeon D-1587 8.86
+35.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2687W 9996
Xeon D-1587 13566
+35.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.53 8.86
Recency 6 March 2012 24 February 2016
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon D-1587 has a 35.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 130.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon D-1587 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2687W in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2687W and Xeon D-1587, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2687W
Xeon E5-2687W
Intel Xeon D-1587
Xeon D-1587

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 37 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2687W on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1587 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2687W or Xeon D-1587, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.