Xeon Gold 6142 vs E5-2687W v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2687W v3
2014
10 cores / 20 threads, 160 Watt
9.45
Xeon Gold 6142
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
16.12
+70.6%

Gold 6142 outperforms E5-2687W v3 by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2687W v3 and Xeon Gold 6142 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking763385
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.618.76
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Gold
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014)Skylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release date8 September 2014 (9 years ago)25 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,946
Current price$431 $1163 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6142 has 56% better value for money than Xeon E5-2687W v3.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2687W v3 and Xeon Gold 6142 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2032
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)1 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache25 MB (shared)22 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature75 °C85 °C
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2687W v3 and Xeon Gold 6142 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration24 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2687W v3 and Xeon Gold 6142. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2687W v3 and Xeon Gold 6142 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2687W v3 and Xeon Gold 6142 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2687W v3 and Xeon Gold 6142. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size768 GB768 GB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2687W v3 and Xeon Gold 6142.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4048

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2687W v3 9.45
Xeon Gold 6142 16.12
+70.6%

Gold 6142 outperforms E5-2687W v3 by 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2687W v3 14615
Xeon Gold 6142 24938
+70.6%

Gold 6142 outperforms E5-2687W v3 by 71% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.45 16.12
Recency 8 September 2014 25 April 2017
Physical cores 10 16
Threads 20 32
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 150 Watt

The Xeon Gold 6142 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2687W v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2687W v3 and Xeon Gold 6142, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3
Xeon E5-2687W v3
Intel Xeon Gold 6142
Xeon Gold 6142

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 54 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2687W v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6142 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2687W v3 or Xeon Gold 6142, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.