Ryzen Threadripper 1940 vs Xeon E5-2680 v4

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking695not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.94no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency8.79no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)29 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,745no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads2828
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache448 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache3.5 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache35 MB32 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size306.18 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Number of transistors4700 Million9,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4 Quad-channel
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 29 July 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 180 Watt

Xeon E5-2680 v4 has 50% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 1940, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2680 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1940 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Xeon E5-2680 v4
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940
Ryzen Threadripper 1940

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4017 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 v4 or Ryzen Threadripper 1940, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.