Pentium 4 630 vs Xeon E5-2680 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Pentium 4 630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking632not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.67no data
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)Pentium 4
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Prescott 2M
Release date10 March 2016 (8 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$1,745no data
Current price$141 (0.1x MSRP)$56

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Pentium 4 630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads282
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3 GHz
Bus support9.6 GT/s / QPI800 MHz
L1 cache448 KBno data
L2 cache3.5 MBno data
L3 cache35 MB2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm90 nm
Die size306 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature86 °C67 °C
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data1.2V-1.4V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Pentium 4 630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt84 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Pentium 4 630. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+no data
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Pentium 4 630 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Pentium 4 630 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Pentium 4 630. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400no data
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Pentium 4 630.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 17791
+6441%
Pentium 4 630 272

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Pentium 4 630 by 6441% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 3707
+131%
Pentium 4 630 1605

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Pentium 4 630 by 131% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 30922
+1466%
Pentium 4 630 1975

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Pentium 4 630 by 1466% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 14 1
Threads 28 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 84 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Pentium 4 630. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2680 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium 4 630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Pentium 4 630, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Xeon E5-2680 v4
Intel Pentium 4 630
Pentium 4 630

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 3293 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 121 vote

Rate Pentium 4 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 v4 or Pentium 4 630, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.