Core i3-370M vs Xeon E5-2680 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2680 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 120 Watt
11.51
+1455%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core i3-370M by a whopping 1455% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core i3-370M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking6302567
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.61no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)Intel Core i3
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date10 March 2016 (8 years ago)20 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,745$245
Current price$126 (0.1x MSRP)$30 (0.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core i3-370M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads284
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus support9.6 GT/s / QPI2500 MHz
L1 cache448 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache3.5 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache35 MB3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size306 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °C90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA
Number of transistors4700 Million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core i3-370M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core i3-370M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMAno data+
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bit36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core i3-370M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core i3-370M are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core i3-370M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TB8 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s17.1 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core i3-370M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core i3-370M.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 11.51
+1455%
i3-370M 0.74

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core i3-370M by 1455% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 17804
+1445%
i3-370M 1152

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core i3-370M by 1445% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 1012
+214%
i3-370M 322

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core i3-370M by 214% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 6977
+975%
i3-370M 649

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core i3-370M by 975% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 3707
+37.8%
i3-370M 2690

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core i3-370M by 38% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 30922
+398%
i3-370M 6204

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core i3-370M by 398% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 8286
+221%
i3-370M 2578

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core i3-370M by 221% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 18
+791%
i3-370M 2

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core i3-370M by 791% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.51 0.74
Recency 10 March 2016 20 June 2010
Physical cores 14 2
Threads 28 4
Cost $1745 $245
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 35 Watt

The Xeon E5-2680 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-370M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2680 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-370M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core i3-370M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Xeon E5-2680 v4
Intel Core i3-370M
Core i3-370M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 3220 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 467 votes

Rate Core i3-370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 v4 or Core i3-370M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.