Core 2 Extreme QX6850 vs Xeon E5-2680 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2680 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 120 Watt
11.51
+678%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6850 by a whopping 678% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core 2 Extreme QX6850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking6242062
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.352.69
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)Core 2 Extreme (Desktop)
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Kentsfield (2007)
Release date10 March 2016 (8 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$1,745no data
Current price$126 (0.1x MSRP)$385

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 has 954% better value for money than Core 2 Extreme QX6850.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core 2 Extreme QX6850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads284
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3 GHz
Bus support9.6 GT/s / QPI1333 MHz
L1 cache448 KBno data
L2 cache3.5 MBno data
L3 cache35 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size306 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core 2 Extreme QX6850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011no data
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core 2 Extreme QX6850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core 2 Extreme QX6850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core 2 Extreme QX6850 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core 2 Extreme QX6850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400no data
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core 2 Extreme QX6850.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 11.51
+678%
Core 2 Extreme QX6850 1.48

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6850 by 678% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 17807
+677%
Core 2 Extreme QX6850 2292

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6850 by 677% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 3707
+19.8%
Core 2 Extreme QX6850 3095

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6850 by 20% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 30922
+181%
Core 2 Extreme QX6850 10990

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6850 by 181% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 8286
+86.2%
Core 2 Extreme QX6850 4450

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6850 by 86% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 18
+421%
Core 2 Extreme QX6850 3

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6850 by 421% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.51 1.48
Physical cores 14 4
Threads 28 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 130 Watt

The Xeon E5-2680 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme QX6850 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2680 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Extreme QX6850 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core 2 Extreme QX6850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Xeon E5-2680 v4
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6850
Core 2 Extreme QX6850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 3120 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 52 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX6850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 v4 or Core 2 Extreme QX6850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.