Celeron M 390 vs Xeon E5-2680 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2680 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 120 Watt
11.15
+5768%
Celeron M 390
1 core / 1 thread, 21 Watt
0.19

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Celeron M 390 by a whopping 5768% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Celeron M 390 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6953242
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.00no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)Celeron M
Power efficiency8.790.86
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,745no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Celeron M 390 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads281
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s400 MHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache448 KBno data
L2 cache3.5 MBno data
L3 cache35 MB1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography14 nm90 nm
Die size306.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature86 °C100 °C
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.004V-1.292V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Celeron M 390 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA2011PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Celeron M 390. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bit32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Celeron M 390 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Celeron M 390 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Celeron M 390. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400no data
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Celeron M 390.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.15 0.19
Physical cores 14 1
Threads 28 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 21 Watt

Xeon E5-2680 v4 has a 5768.4% higher aggregate performance score, 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 390, on the other hand, has 471.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2680 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 390 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2680 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M 390 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Celeron M 390, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Xeon E5-2680 v4
Intel Celeron M 390
Celeron M 390

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4049 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 v4 or Celeron M 390, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.